The familiar story, The Prodigal Son, could be told from the very first verse.
And Jesus said, “A man had two sons.” Luke 15:11 (NAS)
I feel inadequate to add my two cents to it because scholars, preachers, professors, and teachers have already set us straight on what this parable does and does not say. They are careful to warn against the urge to allegorize from its characters and elements. The less didactic, present company included, should glean from its low hanging fruit and let it teach itself. Why tell a 20 minute story to start your sermon about a story the Lord himself cleverly crafted, or get lost in the theological weeds telling it? So succinctly, it is a masterful tale of human nature, grace and disgrace, hoping and believing all things, forgiveness, pride and jealousy, and repentance and restoration,.
All this being said, I thought it might be interesting to profile the starring characters, to reverently build their backstories from clues in the text. One thought is clear though, only when the Lord has invoked a change of heart can a change of heart occur. Sadly, as this story ends, some serious issues in the heart of the eldest son are unresolved and deserve an epilogue.
As a father of four, the first three being boys, I am well aware of the tricky dynamics of budding masculinity. I am also the first born of two sons, so I can understand the psyche of the prodigal’s crotchety brother. The second born was a free spirit, early on itching to sow wild oats. He was not responsible but likable and lovable. His brother towed the line, expecting reward for good behavior. The eldest enjoyed too much adult conversation early on by rank and thought himself to be wiser than he was, and was quietly building a dossier of his father’s shortcomings and foibles. He certainly had his brother’s predilections pegged.
The “old man” was generous to a fault. He desired to please and obviously had difficulty saying no. There is no hint that he wanted the young whippersnapper to learn the hard way. He probably admired his oldest and thought of him as an ally, but was oblivious to his glibness. He had a soft spot for the youngest and probably thought him to be delightful and entertaining. When wayward, he’d talk his way back into the father’s good graces. It is no wonder that when presented with the youngest’s bold request, he quickly acquiesced without sensing that this was a very bad idea. It is important to note the story makes no mention of a discerning wife and partner who might have seen things a different way!
It is clear that the youngest had a plan he needed to fund. He only had a third of his father’s estate coming and the proceeds had to be transportable, fungible, and liquid, so he cashed out. He therefore left a lot on the table to do what he did, to be able to gather it up and go. If he had stayed put, his inheritance would have grown, with access to fixed assets later on. The clear recipient of his rashness was his older brother, who probably thought and vocalized the idea to be hairbrained and shortsighted when he heard of it, and likely predicted his brother would squander it in no time based on past experience.
In the end, the budding prodigal was enabled and in a short matter of time on his way. It’d be unlikely that he’d be cut any slack if he returned, though, as his father stuck with protocol in doling out his lot in life, and his big brother would hold his feet to the fire. He had passed the point of no return.
In a distant foreign land, sans any semblance of the ethical and moral restraints of his father’s faith, the prodigal plunged into riotous living. The money he had in his bag flowed through his fingers like water. For a brief time he was high on life and pleasure, but in the morning reality and regret set in with his hangover. He had lost everything. To eat he’d have to find a job, and it’d be slopping pigs, the ultimate humiliation. That he got himself hired in a foreign country in a time of famine is indicative of his powers to persuade, and it was at this dead end that he came to his senses.
If the prodigal had not “come to his senses” and admitted he had sinned against God, it would have been just another artful way of extricating himself from a self-inflicted jam. His plan in the Lord’s story is absent any angle to restore his privileges. If accepted back he’d be a hired hand first to his father and then to his brother. There was no way around it. He was focused on that sole objective and no other scenario crossed his mind as he set a course to return. It was on that slog back home that he, now a shadow of himself, appealed even more desperately for God’s mercy.
There was not a day gone by that the father was not hoping that his son would return. He did not know how far he’d fallen or if he was even alive. The absence must have been long enough to start losing hope given his reaction when the son returned. He always had one eye on the winding road below. It had become an obsession to cast a glance there repeatedly like a nervous twitch. He finally saw a lonely figure moving toward the house and he quickly gathered up his tunic and sprinted down the path, casting any care aside for the potential humiliation that this act might bring, let alone that he was up in years.
When they met the father loudly wept on the son’s neck. As the wayward son gave his well-rehearsed speech, his father was preoccupied with unbridled joy. In his exuberance he ordered the servants to fetch a festal robe (Zechariah 3:4) and sandals, and put his signet ring (Genesis 41:42) on his son’s finger. These were clear signs of full restoration to the family.
In those days, there was always one calf that was fattened in anticipation of an unplanned celebration, and this would be one for the ages, for his son was dead and now alive!
The older son was unaware of his brother’s return as he arrived back from his dutiful labor in what would eventually be his field. He asked a servant about the ruckus inside and was told the news. Rather than be joyous himself, he was ticked, and turned and began walking away fuming. It might be better said in a jealous rage. Hearing that his older son had been told the happy news, the father immediately went outside to fetch him. Despite his pleading, the older son could only compare and contrast his loyalty and righteousness with the hedonism of his brother. The father rightfully fired back, reminding him that all he had was his, and that what was lost had been found!
This is our God, who puts our sins as far as the east is from the west and remembers them no more. He does not exact his pound of flesh when we go astray as we all do, but restores us to our rightful place in His presence. This is his response to repentance and confession. He does not walk away in disgust but weeps on our neck and then celebrates. He is full of compassion, mercy and grace.
9 He will not always strive with us,
Nor will He keep His anger forever.
10 He has not dealt with us according to our sins,
Nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
11 For as high as the heavens are above the earth,
So great is His lovingkindness toward those who fear Him.
12 As far as the east is from the west,
So far has He removed our transgressions from us.
13 Just as a father has compassion on his children,
So the Lord has compassion on those who fear Him.
14 For He Himself knows our frame;
He is mindful that we are but dust.
Psalm 103:9–14 (NAS)
At the Gate 
These Are the Days—Luke 17:22-37
Jesus’ teaching in Luke 17:22-37 pertains to his Second Coming and shouldn’t be avoided or thought to fall into some category of things “panning out” in the end, but carefully studied.
Matthew talks about his glorious return in Matthew 24:29-31. Paul elaborates on the event in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10. The Apostle Peter also talks about the days leading up to the Lord’s return in his second letter (2 Peter 2:4-6) using the days of Noah and Sodom as examples. There are, of course, other passages that address the Lord’s return directly or indirectly. What follows is my collective understanding of this blessed hope, but anchored in Luke’s account in Chapter 17, since this is a verse-by-verse study.
These instructions follow Jesus’ exchange with the Pharisees in verses 20 and 21, about them missing out on the presence of God in the here and now. A crying shame.
The disciples had pushed to the back of their minds his statement in Luke 9:22: “The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, be killed and then raised up on the third day.” So in 17:22 he reminds them of an anxious future state of affairs.
There’s a saying that goes “you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.” For the disciples, times would never be better than those days accompanying the Lord on his earthly mission. He would send them his Holy Spirit when he left, yes, but his physical presence is what they’d soon yearn for, even but for one day. It’s what we all yearn for as we still live through the days Jesus describes in verse 22.
Knowing that we will be vulnerable during our wait, Satan will attempt to use our eagerness to fill the void, that is, if the Holy Spirit hasn’t. The devil will have our heads spinning with false messiahs if we let him. “Look there! Look here!” (See 2 Peter 2:1-3) Jesus warns (“do not go away, and do not run after them”) and Paul in Ephesians 6:11, tells us to stand firm against his schemes. “Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.”
The illustration of lightning flashing in the sky is all too familiar to me living reportedly in the lightning capital of the world. Indeed, the heavens light up with just one bolt. When he returns on His Day, those present will be blinded by his light.
But first things first. He’d have to suffer a gruesome death, be buried, and rise again. Worse perhaps was the rejection he encountered at the hands of his own people.
One thing I noticed right away reading this passage was the difference in the use of days and day. There are the days of Noah and Sodom, and the days of the Son of Man (Jesus Christ). At the conclusion of the days of Noah and Sodom, there was a day of judgement. When the days of the Son of Man suddenly conclude, there will be the day of our Lord, which always alludes to inescapable final judgment. Those affected will wish to be back in the days of the Son of Man (v. 22) when there was still time.
In Noah and Lot’s days, life was as it is now, in the sense of the normal things you’d expect to be occurring (pertaining to life in general). Then it happens…
These verses have been erroneously interpreted and taught as referring to the Rapture of Christians. The woman “taken” is supposed to rise to meet the Lord in the air. I’ve heard this “take” even from esteemed pastors. But the opposite is true. Those taken have been judged. Those left populate the Kingdom of God. Verse 36 is thought to be added to the original text.
The word for vultures can mean eagles, but the context here is one of judgment, and we rarely see eagles gathered as we do vultures. Matthew 24:28 says, “Wherever the corpse is, there the vultures will gather.”
As I understand it, those on the planet at that time of Christ’s return will be the “ungodly” going about their daily business, a remnant of believers (the “elect” or “chosen ones” in Matt. 24:31) hiding out in the “four corners” of the earth, and those on the housetop or in the field who have one last chance to head for the hills (Luke 17:31).
Moreover, the times or days of the Son of Man go “on the clock” following the Rapture, at the start of the seven-year tribulation. So there will be a final day that can be somewhat “predicted.” It’s much like watching the ark under construction.
Again, it is important to remember there was a day and hour that the door to the ark finally slammed shut with only eight people inside, and the city of Sodom was incinerated.
Like language incorporated into legal documents to address the seriousness of compliance, the readers of this passage must “govern themselves accordingly!”